Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /nfs/c03/h08/mnt/52664/domains/childrenandthelawblog.com/html/wp-content/plugins/microkids-related-posts/microkids-related-posts.php on line 645
2 Groups got Huge Sums for Adoptions, The Japan News
Two adoption agencies for young children in Tokyo received a total of about 83 million yen in donations from adoptive parents in the three years to fiscal 2011, it has been learned.
The two organizations almost always asked adoptive parents to make contributions, The Yomiuri Shimbun has found, and one entity received nearly 2 million yen for a single case.
The Child Welfare Law prohibits arranging the adoption of young children for profit. The Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry has told local governments to research adoption agencies, as it suspects that such large donations could be considered de facto payments for these organizations’ services, a violation of the law.
Under the special adoption system for young children, children aged younger than 6 should in principle be adopted by a married man and woman who are both at least 25 years old, following approval from a family court. Upon adoption, these children lose legal connections–such as inheritance rights–with their biological parents. In other adoptions, legal connections are maintained.
The Child Welfare Law prohibits agencies from making a profit through adoption arrangements, to prevent human trafficking. In 1987, the welfare ministry said agencies can only charge adopted parents actual costs for their services, such as transportation and communication fees. In 2006, the ministry clarified that donations from adoptive parents should be made on a voluntary basis.
The two organizations in question are Baby Life, a foundation in Higashi-Kurume, Tokyo, and Wa no Kai, a nonprofit organization in Shinjuku Ward.
From the Streets of New York, Voices of Anger, Anguish and Resignation in the Wake of the Zimmerman Verdict, Juvenile Justice Information Exchange
Trayvon Martin wasn’t from any of New York City’s five boroughs, but his death and the acquittal of the man who shot and killed the unarmed teen after a confrontation in a gated community courtyard in Florida, nine states, one capital, and nearly 1,200 miles away, resonated with many residents — black, white, and Latino — as if he was one of the city’s own.
Reaction to the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Martin ranged from quiet frustration, embittered resignation, and overwhelming sadness. Some conceded that the jury was left with little option and that it was the fault of a Kafkaesque criminal justice system that legally permits an armed adult to kill a child; others expressed their rage on the avenues of Manhattan and made calls for a type of street justice that has no place in a courtroom.
But in Union Square Park, just after 6 p.m on a sweltering Sunday night, a rancorous crowd of protesters who had gathered to protest the verdict pointed to something deeper than the law or the American criminal justice system for the Zimmerman decision. The animated crowd said they blamed the same pernicious culture of racism that expresses itself in stops and frisks on the streets of New York for the exoneration of a killer in Sanford, Fla.
A few dozen protesters pulled hoodies over their sweat-drenched heads despite the suffocating humidity, others wore buttons and stickers with hoodie silhouettes. Signs peppered the crowd with black and white images of the young, slain Martin.
The District of Columbia’s Children and Family Services Agency (CFSA) has struggled to conduct quality investigations into alleged child abuse and neglect and has fallen short of meeting other court-ordered mandates, according to the latest report from independent monitors tracking the status of the District’s child welfare reform. A status conference to discuss report findings will be held Monday, July 15th at 10:00 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue, NW.
The progress report, covering July-December 2012, reviews the court-ordered reforms spurred by LaShawn A. v. Gray, the federal class-action lawsuit brought by national advocacy organization Children’s Rights. The report, issued by the Center for the Study of Social Policy, is the second since Brenda Donald became CFSA director 18 months ago.
During the review period, Washington, D.C. reached four mandated standards for the first time. CFSA increased efforts to identify and locate known relatives in situations when children had to be removed from their homes, and offered pre-removal “Family Team Meetings” to help make relative placement more successful. The agency also facilitated more visits between siblings who were placed in separate homes, and provided the minimum 15 hours of training to new foster parents.
However, serious concerns remain. Caseloads for investigative social workers continued to be excessive, which, the monitors noted, almost certainly has had “a direct impact” on aspects of their work. Only 62 percent of abuse and neglect investigations were found to be of acceptable quality, well short of the 80 percent benchmark. Workers initiated investigations rapidly enough only 75 percent of the time, rather than the required 95 percent. And for the last two monitoring periods, the number of maltreatment investigations to be completed on time has steadily declined.